Balance Billing
After years of negotiations between the WSMA, stakeholders, and lawmakers,
legislation protecting patients from unexpected bills while preserving
physicians' ability to negotiate fair reimbursement from Washington's
health insurers was passed by the Legislature in 2019.
Effective Jan. 1, 2020, the Balance Billing Protection Act will prohibit
balance billing for emergency services and for certain procedures
performed by out-of-network physicians working in in-network facilities.
BBPA will apply to fully insured health plans in Washington, as well as
self-insured health plans that opt to comply with the law.
In short, the BBPA:
-
Bans balance billing in our state, protecting patients from unexpected
bills.
-
Requires health insurers to reimburse out-of-network physicians at a
commercially reasonable rate.
-
Creates and standardizes an independent dispute resolution process.
- Encourages greater network adequacy.
This summary is current as of Dec. 23, 2019 and is for general information
purposes only. It is not intended to be comprehensive and should not be
relied upon for legal advice or a definitive interpretation of the law.
You may wish to consult with legal counsel for support in navigating
elements of the law including, but not limited to, arbitration,
reimbursement, and transparency.
Additional information about the balance billing law can be found on the
state Office of the Insurance Commissioner's website.
The Washington State Hospital Association's bulletin on the balance
billing law
can be found here.
Definition and Scope of Prohibition
Balance bill is defined as "a bill sent to an enrollee by an
out-of-network provider or facility for health care services provided
to the enrollee after the provider of facility's billed amount is not
fully reimbursed by the carrier, exclusive of permitted cost-sharing."
In other words, the portion of the out-of-network provider's charge
that is not fully reimbursed by the health insurance carrier.
Effective Jan. 1, 2020, a prohibition on balance billing applies to:
- Emergency services provided to an enrollee; or
-
Non-emergency health care services provided to an enrollee at an
in-network hospital or an in-network ambulatory surgical facility if
the services involve surgical or ancillary services and are provided
by an out-of-network provider.
-
"Surgical or ancillary" services are defined as surgery,
anesthesiology, pathology, radiology, laboratory, or hospitalist
services.
A health care provider, hospital, or ambulatory surgical facility may
not require a patient to sign any document that would attempt to avoid
complying with the bill.
Health insurers must reimburse providers and facilities for
out-of-network care relevant to the bill at a "commercially reasonable
amount," based on payments for the same or similar services provided
in a similar geographic area. The payment standard was intentionally
open-ended—an alternative to a payment rate set in statute after years
of negotiation with the WSMA, WSHA, and other health care
stakeholders.
Reimbursement must be made within 30 calendar days of receipt of a
claim and paid directly to the out-of-network provider or facility
(rather than routing through the patient).
Enrollees of a health plan satisfy their obligation to pay for
services relevant to the bill by paying the equivalent of their
in-network cost-sharing for the services, determined by using the
insurer's median in-network contracted rate for the same or similar
service in the same or similar geographic area. Insurers must provide
an explanation of benefits (EOB) to the enrollee and the
out-of-network provider that specifies the patient's responsibility.
Application of Prohibition to Health Plans and Determining Patient
Eligibility
The balance billing prohibition applies to fully insured commercial
health plans (i.e. plans subject to regulation under RCW 48.43);
public employee plans (RCW 41.05); and self-insured plans that
voluntarily elect to comply with the law (more information regarding
ERISA plans below).
Self-insured group health plans that are governed by federal law (aka
ERISA plans) may elect to comply with the reimbursement and dispute
resolution provisions of the balance billing law by notifying the
Washington State Office of the Insurance Commissioner.
Out-of-network providers and facilities may continue to balance bill
enrollees of ERISA plans that do not opt to comply with the law.
Insurers must make information available through electronic and other
methods of communication "generally used by a provider" to allow
providers to verify whether an enrollee's health plan is subject to
the balance billing prohibition and associated requirements of the
law.
The primary method by which insurers must make the information
available is through the HIPAA-mandated X12 Health Care Eligibility
Benefit Response (271) transaction, using a standard message that is
placed in a standard location within the 271 transaction. More details
on the electronic notification process can be found on
OneHealthPort's webpage.
Dispute Resolution
If an out-of-network provider or facility wishes to dispute an
insurer's payment, they must notify the insurer within 30 calendar
days after the receipt of payment or payment notification from the
insurer. This notification begins a 30-day informal negotiation period
between the two parties. The insurer may not require the payment that
was made to be rejected or returned by a provider or facility as a
condition of putting the payment into dispute.
If informal negotiation does not yield agreement, either party may
initiate arbitration to determine a commercially reasonable payment
amount. To initiate arbitration, the petitioning entity must provide
written notification to the Office of the Insurance Commissioner (OIC)
and the non-initiating party within 10 days of the completion of the
30-day informal negotiation period. The notice must include the
initiating party's final offer. Within 30 days, the non-initiating
party must provide its final offer in response. The parties may reach
an agreement on reimbursement during this time.
Multiple claims may be "bundled" for concurrent consideration in
arbitration under the following circumstances:
- The claims occur within a two-month timeframe;
-
The claims involve the same two parties (i.e. insurer and
provider/facility); and
-
The claims involve the same or related CPT codes relevant to a
particular procedure.
An arbitrator is selected through a defined process, and within 30
days of selection, parties to arbitration must make written
submissions to the arbitrator in support of their positions. If one
party does not make a timely submission, they are in default and the
arbitrator will rule for the participating party and may hold the
default party responsible for arbitration costs. Within 30 days of
receipt of the written submissions, the arbitrator must issue a
written decision, selecting the final offer amount of one of the
parties. Expenses incurred in the course of arbitration must be
divided equally among the parties to the arbitration (not including
attorneys' fees).
In making a determination, arbitrators must consider the following
factors:
-
The evidence submitted by the parties in support of their positions;
-
"Patient characteristics and the circumstances and complexity of the
case, including time and place of service and whether the service
was delivered at a level I or level II trauma center or a rural
facility that are not already reflected in the provider's billing
code for the service."
-
The data set compiled from the Washington all-payer claims database,
including claims for median in-network amounts, median
out-of-network allowed amounts, and median billed charges for the
same or similar services in a geographic area. Once compiled, the
data set is adjusted in subsequent years by applying the consumer
price index-medical component from the U.S. Department of Labor,
Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Both parties to the arbitration must sign a non-disclosure agreement.
The NDA does not preclude the arbitrator from submitting the final
decision to the OIC. The OIC compiles arbitration decisions into an
annual report, detailing parties to arbitration and the type of health
care service at issue.
When determining the adequacy of a provider network, the OIC must
consider whether the insurer's proposed network includes a sufficient
number of contracted providers of emergency and surgical or ancillary
services at the insurer's contracted facilities "to reasonably ensure
enrollees have in-network access to covered benefits delivered at that
facility."
Health care providers and facilities must include the following
information on their website, if they have one, and upon notice to a
patient upon request:
-
The standard notification of consumer rights developed by the OIC. A
link to the notice can be found here.
-
A listing of the insurer health plan provider networks with which
the provider contracts, based on information that is shared by the
contracting insurer. The law requires insurers to "clearly set
forth" the provider networks that are included in provider contracts
and compensation agreements in a format that would be understandable
to a reasonable person.
For any facility or provider that is owned and operated independently
from all other businesses and that has more than 50 employees, upon
confirming that a patient's health plan is subject to the balance
billing law, the notification of consumer rights must be included in
any communication to a patient (electronic or otherwise) confirming
the scheduling of nonemergency surgical or ancillary services at a
facility.
Providers must submit information to insurers about the provider's
network status in a timely manner, consistent with the terms of the
contract between the two entities.
Insurers must update their provider directories within 30 days of
additions or subtractions of facilities or providers.
Upon request, insurers must provide information to enrollees about
whether health care providers are in-network or out-of-network and
whether there are in-network providers available to provide services
at specified in-network facilities. Upon request, insurers must also
provide enrollees with an estimated range of the out-of-pocket costs
for an out-of-network benefit.
If the OIC has cause to believe that a health care provider or
facility has engaged in "a pattern of unresolved violations" of the
balance billing law, the OIC may submit information to the relevant
disciplining authority at the Department of Health (e.g. the
Washington Medical Commission). In advance of submitting information
to DOH, the OIC may "provide the health care provider, hospital or
ambulatory surgical facility, with an opportunity to cure the alleged
violations or explain why the actions in question did not violate" the
balance billing law.
The disciplining authority may levy fines or impose cost recovery upon
the provider/facility within existing authority. A pattern of
violations of the law constitutes unprofessional conduct.
The OIC may levy fines or apply remedies within its regulatory
authority upon insurers who fail to comply with the law.
It is stipulated that it is an unfair or deceptive business practice
for a health insurer to initiate arbitration "with such frequency as
to indicate a general business practice."
Pursuant to the balance billing law, the OIC has contracted with the
Washington all-payer claims database (APCD) to compile a data set to
provide insurers, providers, facilities, and arbitrators with
information pertaining to be a resource for dispute resolution and
negotiations.
The data set includes median in-network amounts and median billed
charges for services relevant to the law, per CPT code, for services
relevant to the law. The data set excludes Medicaid and Medicare
claims, as well as claims paid on other than a fee-for-service basis.
Claims are displayed on a regional basis (per the OIC geographic
rating regions) as well as a statewide basis.
Due to inadequate claims data for anesthesia services (i.e. APCD
claims data did not include time components), anesthesia is excluded
from the data set.
Going forward, data sets will be adjusted annually by applying the
consumer price index-medical component established by the U.S.
Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
The data set (and additional information pertaining to it) can be
reviewed
on the OIC's webpage.